Huan Tao1 , Adrienne O’Neil 2,3, Yunseon Choi 4 , Wei Wang5 , Junfeng Wang6 , Yafeng Wang7 *, Yongqian Jia1 * and Xiong Chen8 *
1 Department of Hematology and Research Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2 The Centre for Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia, 3 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia, 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea, 5 School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 6 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, 7 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, 8 Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
Objective: The relationship between diabetes and all- and cause-specific mortality in individuals with common cancers (breast, colorectal, and prostate) remains both under-researched and poorly understood.
Methods: Cancer survivors (N = 37,993) from the National Health Interview Survey with linked data retrieved from the National Death Index served as our study participants. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess associations between pre- and post-diabetes and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.
Results: Over a median follow-up period of 13 years, 2,350 all-cause, 698 cancer, and 506 CVD deaths occurred. Among all cancer survivors, patients with diabetes had greater risk of: all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% CI = 1.27–1.43], cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27), CVD mortality (HR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.18–1.55), diabetes related mortality (HR: 17.18, 95% CI = 11.51–25.64), and kidney disease mortality (HR: 2.51, 95% CI = 1.65–3.82), compared with individuals without diabetes. The risk of all-cause mortality was also higher amongst those with diabetes and specific types of cancer: breast cancer (HR: 1.28, 95% CI = 1.12–1.48), prostate cancer (HR: 1.20, 95% CI = 1.03–1.39), and colorectal cancer (HR: 1.29, 95% CI = 1.10–1.50). Diabetes increased the risk of cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer survivors (HR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.04–1.78) compared to those without diabetes. Diabetes was associated with higher risk of diabetes-related mortality when compared to non-diabetic breast (HR: 9.20, 95% CI = 3.60–23.53), prostate (HR: 18.36, 95% CI = 6.01–56.11), and colorectal cancer survivors (HR: 12.18, 95% CI = 4.17–35.58). Both pre- and post-diagnosis diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality among all cancer survivors. Cancer survivors with diabetes had similar risk of all-cause and CVD mortality during the second 5 years of diabetes and above 10 years of diabetes as compared to non-diabetic patients.
Conclusions: Diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors, not for pre- or post-diagnosis diabetes. Greater attention on diabetes management is warranted in cancer survivors with diabetes.
Keywords: diabetes, all-cause, cancer, cardiovascular disease, mortality, cohort study
Magda Shaheen1 *, Katrina M. Schrode1 , Marielle Tedlos 1 , Deyu Pan1 , Sonia M. Najjar 2 and Theodore C. Friedman1
1 Charles R. Drew University, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2 Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States
Aim: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) exhibits a racial disparity. We examined the prevalence and the association between race, gender, and NAFLD among prediabetes and diabetes populations among adults in the United States.
Methods: We analyzed data for 3,190 individuals ≥18 years old from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018. NAFLD was diagnosed by FibroScan ® using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values: S0 (none) < 238, S1 (mild) = 238-259, S2 (moderate) = 260-290, S3 (severe) > 290. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for confounding variables and considering the design and sample
Results: Of the 3,190 subjects, the prevalence of NAFLD was 82.6%, 56.4%, and 30.5% (p < 0.0001) among diabetes, prediabetes and normoglycemia populations respectively. Mexican American males with prediabetes or diabetes had the highest prevalence of severe NAFLD relative to other racial/ethnic groups (p < 0.05). In the adjusted model, among the total, prediabetes, and diabetes populations, a one unit increase in HbA1c was associated with higher odds of severe NAFLD [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.8, 95% confidence level (CI) = 1.4-2.3, p < 0.0001; AOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.1-4.4, p = 0.033; and AOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-1.9, p = 0.003 respectively].
Conclusion: We found that prediabetes and diabetes populations had a high prevalence and higher odds of NAFLD relative to the normoglycemic population and HbA1c is an independent predictor of NAFLD severity in prediabetes and diabetes populations. Healthcare providers should screen prediabetes and diabetes populations for early detection of NAFLD and initiate treatments including lifestyle modification to prevent the progression to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or liver cancer.
KEYWORDS
NAFLD severity, prediabetes, diabetes, NHANES 2017-2018, race/ethnicity, gender
原创：伤口治疗及造口护理中心
不管哪种肤质，哪怕是“天生丽质”的人，都会存在或多或少的小毛病，每种不同的肤质可能出现的问题也各有侧重，当皮肤出现问题时就应该警醒了，应该立即审视和调整你的计划，那么我们应该如何科学评估自己的皮肤？今天小编就告诉大家医生及伤口师是如何评估我们的皮肤的。
皮肤是作为人类健康与美丽的象征，当我们最初注意到一个人时，她健康的肌肤往往是形成美好的第一印象的重要因素。
健康与美丽是分不开的，尤其是对皮肤来说，这一点更加重要，如果没有了健康，便根本谈不上皮肤的美丽。
在日常的工作、学习、生活中，难免会有磕磕碰碰，时不时我们的身体就是因某些原因，造成不可避免的伤口出现。有时我们会发现，有些伤口会快速愈合甚至不留痕迹，而有些伤口经久不愈甚至情况愈演愈烈，造成不可挽回的后果，只有我们能够简单的初步认识伤口的各种情况，才能更好地对待我们所发生的一些伤口情况，使其快速愈合，让我们的身体恢复健康。
今天，小编就给大家讲解一下什么是伤口以及伤口的分类。
在日常生活中，当我们的机体受到伤害而造成伤口的时候，最希望伤口能够尽快愈合，恢复到未受伤时候的状态。通过观察不难发现，伤口几乎是一天一个样，那么机体是如何让伤口产生这些变化的呢？伤口有时如何进行修复的呢？
今天小编就告诉大家伤口的愈合过程，通过了解这个过程，我们能够更好地了解自己伤口所处在的周期，以及能够大概了解伤口是往好的方向发展还是往坏的方向恶化。话不多说，下面介绍今天的主题！
伤口世界平台生态圈，以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景，连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源，倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口，解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考，最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点，不代表本站同意其说法，请谨慎参阅，本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。
