版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章。
引用本文:简喜超, 简扬, 邓呈亮. 2025版《中国糖尿病足防治实践指南》解读[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2026, 32(2): 99-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114657-20251215-00266.
通信作者:邓呈亮,Email:该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。
Athina Stamati1 · Athanasios Christoforidis2
Received: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 December 2024 / Published online: 10 January 2025 © The Author(s) 2025
Abstract
Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems compared to standard care in managing glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM).
Methods We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, registries and conference abstracts up to June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing AID to standard care in pregnant women with T1DM. We con-ducted random effects meta-analyses for % of 24-h time in range of 63–140 mg/dL (TIR), time in hyperglycaemia (>140 mg/ dl and>180 mg/dL), hypoglycaemia (<63 mg/dl and<54 mg/dL), total insulin dose (units/kg/day), glycemic variability (%), changes in HbA1c (%), maternal and fetal outcomes.
Results Thirteen studies (450 participants) were included. AID significantly increased TIR (Mean difference, MD 7.01%, 95% CI 3.72–10.30) and reduced time in hyperglycaemia>140 mg/dL and>180 mg/dL (MD – 5.09%, 95% CI – 9.41 to – 0.78 and MD – 2.44%, 95% CI – 4.69 to – 0.20, respectively). Additionally, glycaemic variability was significantly reduced (MD – 1.66%, 95% CI – 2.73 to – 0.58). Other outcomes did not differ significantly.
Conclusion AID systems effectively improve glycaemic control during pregnancy in women with T1DM by increasing TIR and reducing hyperglycaemia without any observed adverse short-term effects on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Keywords Automated insulin delivery · Pregnancy · Type 1 diabetes mellitus · Systematic review · Meta-analysis
Author: Theophila Lan Si’Ai
Theophila Lan Si’Ai is Senior Podiatrist, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
Complex and complicated wounds (CCWs) tend to exhibit slow wound healing and poor prognoses despite good standards of care. Numerous literature demonstrated the efficacy of TLC-NOSF dressing (UrgoStart®) in healing of both acute and chronic wounds. The author thus hypothesised that inclusion of TLCNOSF dressing in dressing regimes would enhance wound healing and improve outcomes in CCW. This paper successfully verifies the hypothesis on three such wounds, with good wound healing outcomes achieved.
Author:
Corey Heerschap
Corey Heerschap is Wound/ Ostomy Clinical Nurse Specialist at Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre in Barrie, ON, Canada, and a PhD student at Queens University in Kingston, ON, Canada. He is the President-Elect of Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada, Inaugural Panel Member of the Canadian Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, and Education CoLead for the Commonwealth Wound Care Resource Alliance.
Joyce Black
Joyce Black is Professor, College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, US
Despite the frequency of pressure ulcers on the heels, little is written about them. While these ten top tips will not fill the literature gap, it may help you with this common problem.
A case series was conducted to demonstrate the safe and effective use of a 14-day Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (sNPWT) in the management of static, ‘hard-to-heal’ wounds. When used in conjunction with optimal wound care strategies, including holistic assessment and comprehensive patient empowerment and education, the use of sNPWT resulted in the closure of all chronic wounds in this case series despite complex histories. This case series demonstrates enhanced results when a proactive, holistic and patient-centred approach is adopted in conjunction with sNPWT.
Authors:
Hayley Ryan and Joanne Handsaker
Hayley Ryan is Director of Wounds Rescue/Wounds Australia Board Director & Chair, Wound Clinical Nurse Consultant (WCNC);
Joanne Handsaker is Clinical Strategy –Global Clinical Strategy Specialist, Smith and Nephew
伤口世界平台生态圈,以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景,连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源,倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口,解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考,最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点,不代表本站同意其说法,请谨慎参阅,本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。