Huan Tao1 , Adrienne O’Neil 2,3, Yunseon Choi 4 , Wei Wang5 , Junfeng Wang6 , Yafeng Wang7 *, Yongqian Jia1 * and Xiong Chen8 *
1 Department of Hematology and Research Laboratory of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, 2 The Centre for Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia, 3 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia, 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea, 5 School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 6 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, 7 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, 8 Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
Objective: The relationship between diabetes and all- and cause-specific mortality in individuals with common cancers (breast, colorectal, and prostate) remains both under-researched and poorly understood.
Methods: Cancer survivors (N = 37,993) from the National Health Interview Survey with linked data retrieved from the National Death Index served as our study participants. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess associations between pre- and post-diabetes and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.
Results: Over a median follow-up period of 13 years, 2,350 all-cause, 698 cancer, and 506 CVD deaths occurred. Among all cancer survivors, patients with diabetes had greater risk of: all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% CI = 1.27–1.43], cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27), CVD mortality (HR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.18–1.55), diabetes related mortality (HR: 17.18, 95% CI = 11.51–25.64), and kidney disease mortality (HR: 2.51, 95% CI = 1.65–3.82), compared with individuals without diabetes. The risk of all-cause mortality was also higher amongst those with diabetes and specific types of cancer: breast cancer (HR: 1.28, 95% CI = 1.12–1.48), prostate cancer (HR: 1.20, 95% CI = 1.03–1.39), and colorectal cancer (HR: 1.29, 95% CI = 1.10–1.50). Diabetes increased the risk of cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer survivors (HR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.04–1.78) compared to those without diabetes. Diabetes was associated with higher risk of diabetes-related mortality when compared to non-diabetic breast (HR: 9.20, 95% CI = 3.60–23.53), prostate (HR: 18.36, 95% CI = 6.01–56.11), and colorectal cancer survivors (HR: 12.18, 95% CI = 4.17–35.58). Both pre- and post-diagnosis diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality among all cancer survivors. Cancer survivors with diabetes had similar risk of all-cause and CVD mortality during the second 5 years of diabetes and above 10 years of diabetes as compared to non-diabetic patients.
Conclusions: Diabetes increased the risk of all-cause mortality among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors, not for pre- or post-diagnosis diabetes. Greater attention on diabetes management is warranted in cancer survivors with diabetes.
Keywords: diabetes, all-cause, cancer, cardiovascular disease, mortality, cohort study
Magda Shaheen1 *, Katrina M. Schrode1 , Marielle Tedlos 1 , Deyu Pan1 , Sonia M. Najjar 2 and Theodore C. Friedman1
1 Charles R. Drew University, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2 Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States
Aim: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) exhibits a racial disparity. We examined the prevalence and the association between race, gender, and NAFLD among prediabetes and diabetes populations among adults in the United States.
Methods: We analyzed data for 3,190 individuals ≥18 years old from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018. NAFLD was diagnosed by FibroScan ® using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values: S0 (none) < 238, S1 (mild) = 238-259, S2 (moderate) = 260-290, S3 (severe) > 290. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for confounding variables and considering the design and sample
Results: Of the 3,190 subjects, the prevalence of NAFLD was 82.6%, 56.4%, and 30.5% (p < 0.0001) among diabetes, prediabetes and normoglycemia populations respectively. Mexican American males with prediabetes or diabetes had the highest prevalence of severe NAFLD relative to other racial/ethnic groups (p < 0.05). In the adjusted model, among the total, prediabetes, and diabetes populations, a one unit increase in HbA1c was associated with higher odds of severe NAFLD [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.8, 95% confidence level (CI) = 1.4-2.3, p < 0.0001; AOR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.1-4.4, p = 0.033; and AOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.1-1.9, p = 0.003 respectively].
Conclusion: We found that prediabetes and diabetes populations had a high prevalence and higher odds of NAFLD relative to the normoglycemic population and HbA1c is an independent predictor of NAFLD severity in prediabetes and diabetes populations. Healthcare providers should screen prediabetes and diabetes populations for early detection of NAFLD and initiate treatments including lifestyle modification to prevent the progression to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or liver cancer.
KEYWORDS
NAFLD severity, prediabetes, diabetes, NHANES 2017-2018, race/ethnicity, gender
原创：十六点五 中山二院糖尿病足中心
糖尿病足到底痛不痛，是一个很痛苦的问题。如果不痛，患者觉得“脚都不痛了，肯定死完全了，还能保吗？”。
无数来到我科“中心”的外地病人唯一的理由就是：他们要截我的脚！
原创： 十六点五 中山二院糖尿病足中心
随着糖尿病患病人数的不断增加，糖尿病足的病人也越来越多，在平时的临床实践中，笔者发现很多糖尿病足病友搞不清楚糖尿病足应该由什么科管？或者说哪个科的医师负责糖尿病足的诊断和治疗。
正大型全麻术后伤口感染是较为常见的院内感染类型之一,也是较为常见的围手术期并发症之一。对于外科患者而言,出现伤口感染将带来诸多负担,如住院时间的延长,住院费用的提高,术后功能康复时间延长及效果不佳,术后延误放化疗治疗等。罹患口腔恶性肿瘤的患者一般多为中老年患者,而且大多都需要接受皮瓣修复,淋巴清扫,显微血管吻合等较为复杂的手术治疗方法。
伤口世界平台生态圈，以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景，连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源，倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口，解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考，最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点，不代表本站同意其说法，请谨慎参阅，本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。
