Boost of cosmetic active ingredient penetration triggered and controlled by the delivery of kHz plasma jet on human skin explants

首页
病情图文
- 糖尿病足
- 压疮
- 感染伤口
- 造口
- 溃疡
  
  动脉性溃疡
  
  静脉性溃疡
  
  放射性溃疡
- 烧伤
- 创伤
- 少见伤口
- 祛疤止痒
- 皮肤病
医师讲座
名医介绍
专业服务

糖尿病足

压疮

造口

溃疡

烧伤
蔡道章院长

Custom Mod Mega1

主任医师、教授、博导，南方医科大学第三附属医院（广东省骨科医院）院长

中德骨科伤口管理学校校长

广东省骨科研究院运动医学研究所所长

广东省内运动医学专业唯一的博士研究生导师

美国哈弗大学医学院骨科访问学者

专业特长处于省内领先、国内或国际先进水平以上

2018年获得“国之名医卓越建树”荣誉称号

2017年被评为全国卫生计生系统先进工作者、广东省医学领军人才

中国医师协会运动医师分会副会长

STCOT中国部运动医学分会副主任委员

广东省医学会关节外科分会主任委员

广东省医学会运动医学会分会名誉主任委员

独立承担过国家“863”课题，主持过10余项省、部级科研项目

多份专业杂志编委
文献精选
伤口分类

糖尿病足

压疮

感染伤口

造口

溃疡

烧伤

更多关于伤口信息
最新文献

Comparison of the night-time effectiveness in achieving glycemic targets in adults with type 1 diabetes of three advanced hybryd closed-loop systems 2026-06-18 00:00

Nicolò Diego Borella1 · Antonio Ferramosca2 · Giona Castagna1 · Silvia Ippolito1 · Sara Ceresoli2 · Antonio Taverna1 · Beatrice Sonzogni2 · Roberto Trevisan1,3 · Giuseppe Lepore1

Received: 6 March 2024 / Accepted: 15 October 2024 / Published online: 22 November 2024 © The Author(s) 2024

Abstract

Context Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems currently represent the most advanced modality of insulin therapy.

Aim To compare the night-time (from 00 to 07 a.m.) effectiveness in achieving recommended glycemic targets of three dif-ferent AHCL systems in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods We retrospectively evaluated 55 adults with T1D (mean age 41±16 years, male 40%, diabetes duration 19.4±11.4 years, BMI 24.1±4.1 kg/m2 ) with similar glycemic control (GMI 7.0–7.4%). Twenty-two participants were using the Minimed 780G system, 18 the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ system and 15 the DBLG1 system. Continuous glucose monitoring derived metrics and insulin requirement of 14 consecutive nights were

Results All three groups achieved the recommended mean TIR>70%, mean TBR<4%, and mean CV<36% with a similar insulin requirement (Minimed 780G system: TIR 73.9±11.2%, TBR 0.9±1.2%, CV 29±6.7%; Tandem t:slim X2 with Con-trol-IQ system: TIR 74.1±11.1%, TBR 1.1±1.0%, CV 34.5±6.6%; DBLG1 System TIR 71.7±11.3%, TBR 1.4±3.7%, CV 32.4±7.1%). Tight TIR% (70–140 mg/dl) was significantly higher (p<0.01) in the Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ group (51.5±9.8%) when compared to Minimed 780G group (42.1±13.7%) and DBLG1 System (40.1±10.5%). In all three groups the insulin infusion similarly decreased from midnight to 05.00 am and then increased.

Conclusions All the three AHCL systems achieved the recommended TIR, TBR and CV without difference in insulin requirement. The Tandem Control-IQ system obtained a higher tight TIR.

The potential of precision diabetology for type 2 diabetes treatment— evidence from a meta-regression for all-cause mortality from large cardiovascular outcome trials 2026-06-17 00:00

Oliver Kuss1,2,3 · Michael Roden3,4,5 · Sabrina Schlesinger1,3 · Annika Hoyer6

Received: 27 May 2024 / Accepted: 23 November 2024 / Published online: 12 December 2024 © The Author(s) 2024

Abstract

Aims Two prerequisites must be met for the precision treatment approach to be beneficial for treated individuals. First, there must be treatment heterogeneity; second, in case of treatment heterogeneity, clinical predictors to identify people who would benefit from one treatment more than from others must be available. There is an established meta-regression approach to assess these two prerequisites that relies on measuring the variability of a clinical outcome after treatment in placebo-controlled randomised trials. We recently applied this approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes for the clinical outcomes of glycaemic control and body weight and repeat it for the clinical outcome of all-cause mortality.

Methods We performed a meta-regression analysis using digitalized individual participant information on time to death from 10 large cardiovascular outcome trials (7563 deaths from 99,746 participants) on DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors with respect to the variability of all-cause mortality and its potential predictors after treatment.

Results The adjusted difference in log(SD) values of time to death between the verum and placebo arms was −0.036 (95%- CI: −0.059; −0.013), showing larger variability of time to death in the placebo arms. No clinical predictors were found to explain treatment heterogeneity.

Conclusions This analysis suggests that the potential of the precision treatment approach in type 2 diabetes is low, at least with regard to improvement of all-cause mortality in population with high cardiovascular risk. This extends our previous findings for the clinical outcomes of glycaemic control and body weight.

Keywords Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors · Glucagon-like peptide 1 · HbA1c · Meta-regression · Precision medicine · Sodium–glucose transporter 2 inhibitors · Type 2 diabetes mellitus
互动快递