Bronte Jeffrey1,2*, Logan Gardner6,7, Michelle Le1 , Julie Frost1 and Ming Wei Lin1,3,4,5
*Correspondence: Bronte Jeffrey 该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。
1 Department of Clinical Immunology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
2 St Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
3 Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
4 Department of Immunopathology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
5 Centre for Immunology and Allergy Research, Westmead Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
6 Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
7 School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
İbrahim Halil Aydoğdu | Esen Özkaya Department of Dermatology and Venereology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
Correspondence: İbrahim Halil Aydoğdu (该Email地址已收到反垃圾邮件插件保护。要显示它您需要在浏览器中启用JavaScript。)
Received: 26 April 2025 | Revised: 14 June 2025 | Accepted: 30 June 2025
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Keywords: allergic contact dermatitis | carbamate | epidemiology | glove | mercapto | nonoccupational | occupational | patch test | rubber additives | thiuram
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2025 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ABSTRACT
Background: Rubber additives are common causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) worldwide, yet data from Turkey remain
Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of rubber additive sensitisation and its clinical/occupational relevance in a tertiary re ferral centre.
Methods: A retrospective study on 2687 consecutively patch-tested patients with rubber additives at our allergy unit between 1996 and 2023.
Results: Rubber sensitisation was found in 10.6%, with a slight increase after 2010. Male predominance was noted (female: male=1:2.3). Thiurams and carbamates were the most frequent sensitizers. ACD was diagnosed in 7.9%, primarily caused by gloves (85.5%). Hands were most commonly affected (94.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that thiuram and carba mate sensitisation was significantly associated with hand eczema, while benzothiazole derivatives were linked to foot eczema. Airborne ACD occurred in 4.2%, mainly in healthcare workers. Hand eczema with and without wrist extension was observed with similar frequency. Occupational ACD accounted for 79.3% of cases, especially among construction (56.8%) and healthcare workers (14.8%), with a relative increase in the latter group after 2015.
Conclusions: The high prevalence of sensitisation from rubber gloves is concerning. Legal measures are urgently needed, includ ing safer additives and clearer glove labelling. Patch testing remains essential, even without the classic glove-pattern distribution.
原创： 十六点五 中山二院糖尿病足中心
含银的敷料是目前治疗糖尿病足的主流敷料，有各种剂型，包括泡沫状、胶冻态、液态、粉末态、膏态等等，生产的厂家的非常多，其中的质量良莠不齐，很难鉴别。
进一步的清创就到了骨骼，对于骨髓炎最彻底的治疗方法就是去除被细菌侵袭的骨，正常的骨骼一般是浅黄色，如果发白或者变黑，往往就提示这段骨头可能活性比较差，另外，还有一种是面积比较大的骨暴露，一般的肉芽组织很难爬上去，因此，对于坏死的骨头及较大面积的骨暴露，一般需要清除。
皮下组织中的脂肪组织在足部分布广泛，而皮下脂肪中血管分布非常少，在相对或绝对缺血的糖尿病足中，脂肪组织边缘的是否出血不是其是否存活的可靠指标。
这是一个我们在《糖尿病足切开设计（1）》中提到过，这次从不同角度谈谈足趾的保全。
大趾是足部最重要的结构，如果被切除，对足部的功能会有比较大的影响，因此，应该尽可能的保存。
感染的足趾是比较常见的一种糖尿病足表现形式，能否保全足趾是一个比较有技巧的工作，现举例说明
伤口世界平台生态圈，以“关爱人间所有伤口患者”为愿景，连接、整合和拓展线上和线下的管理慢性伤口的资源，倡导远程、就近和居家管理慢性伤口，解决伤口专家的碎片化时间的价值创造、诊疗经验的裂变复制、和患者的就近、居家和低成本管理慢性伤口的问题。
2019广东省医疗行业协会伤口管理分会年会
扫一扫了解详情:
任何关于疾病的建议都不能替代执业医师的面对面诊断。所有门诊时间仅供参考，最终以医院当日公布为准。
网友、医生言论仅代表其个人观点，不代表本站同意其说法，请谨慎参阅，本站不承担由此引起的法律责任。
